I read an interesting article on The American Prospect web site this weekend. The article entitled “How the Stimulus Screws Commuters” makes the argument that Congress is missing a big opportunity by not putting enough funding into public transit. By spending most of the transportation money on highways, they are not doing enough to help the environment.
Currently there is $27 billion proposed for highway projects that will create new jobs and address our aging roads. Now I wrote a post last month called Transportation Headaches that examines how massive spending is not the answer to our problems. This will create jobs, but I have a tough time with the argument that we will “save” money with this kind of spending.
The stimulus package also wants to allocate 11.5 billion in tax incentives for automobile purchases. I understand the desire to help the Big 3 Automakers, but I don’t think putting more cars on the road is really the answer. If the automakers had invested more research on alternative fuels, maybe they would be offering better cars today. They were happy making big profits on SUV’s and we were too happy to buy them, but times have changed and they need to change with them.
Yes, the primary goal of the stimulus package should be to stimulate the economy. So while road work and automobile purchases could provide a spark, they will not light a fire to long term growth. I would rather see more money put into projects that would help our economy and our ecology.
When gas prices rose, so did transit ridership. Investments in mass transit, alternative energy and reducing traffic should be our main focus. We could boost the sagging economy while also addressing climate change. That is the type of spending I could support, what about you?
photo credit: Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com


