There has been a lot of debate lately over several proposed bills in Congress.  These bills, known as “Cash for Clunkers” aim to stimulate new car sales while retiring older vehicles.  The basic idea behind these bills sounds good, get older cars off the road and replace them with more fuel efficient vehicles.

This seems logical and makes sense on the surface, but let’s dig deeper.  First, I have been arguing for fewer cars on the roads.  This plan will not reduce traffic in any way and will encourage more car sales instead of increased alternative transportation.

Second, it rewards drivers of gas guzzlers.  This does not offer anything to the drivers who have already made the right decision and bought a more fuel efficient car.  So everyone that already cares about the planet, you’re out of luck.

Third, what about the waste from junking all of these “clunkers”?  They will try to set up a program to strip and salvage many of the parts from these retired vehicles, but it still seems like this will create a large amount of waste.

Fourth, more fuel efficient cars will encourage more driving.  So, many drivers that will now be “saving” gas will have even less incentive to reduce the miles they travel.

Fifth, there is a stipulation to buy American to qualify for the cash.  Does this violate free trade agreements?  I’m sure foreign auto makers will be angry and potentially retaliate by not importing American goods.

Sixth, this seems to benefit the auto makers more than the public.  Is this just another way for the government to give aid to the failing auto industry?

We desperately need to move away from our current car model and reduce traffic, not buy more cars while building additional roads.  That’s what we have been doing for the last 50 years and look where it has gotten us.

To me, this is like rearranging deck chairs on the Titantic.  The ship is still sinking and we need to make much bigger changes than just trading in one car for another.

photo credit: mtneer_man

Last year I wrote about how hypermiling can dramatically cut your gasoline consumption.  Well, I recently learned that the New Oxford Dictionary announced hypermiling as the 2008 word of the year.  They discuss the history of the word, some of the methods and positive results of changing bad driving habits.  If you began keeping a log of your own gas mileage, then you could test hypermiling to see what kind of personal gains can be achieved.

In another story, you can see that web based tools and the internet can help cut vehicle emissions.  A pilot program in Denver configured 400 vehicles with greenhouse gas-tracking systems to provide the driver with feedback on their driving.  They could immediately see the impact of rapid acceleration, sudden braking and excessive idling.  This information resulted in reduced emissions and better fuel economy.

Automakers have also begun informing drivers with real time statistics.  The Toyota Prius already encourages drivers to seek more efficient energy use through a digital interface.  Now Honda is taking it a step further with their upcoming new car, the Insight.  This story on Earth2Tech discusses how the “Eco Assist” dashboard turns fuel efficiency into a video game.  They compare this to a Wii Fit for cars where drivers are rewarded with positive feedback for good driving behavior.

We should all strive to cut our gasoline consumption and reduce vehicle emissions with hypermiling, web based tools and enhanced driver instrument panels.  Good driving habits combined with advancement in technology could go far in improving our fuel efficiency.  Maybe someday all cars will be connected to the internet to help reduce our consumption, track carbon emissions and offer peer review through community.  I would like to add passenger energy as the next advancement in our fight for energy independence.  How ‘bout you?

photo credit: Marcin Wichary

In the winter, many parents will drive their kids to and from the bus stop every day.  Then they idle their car or van waiting for the bus while they waste precious gas and generate excess exhaust.  Most times, you see several neighbors on the same street, each with their own vehicle idling.

This may seem like a small issue and it is, for just one vehicle.  Now consider all the parents across the country and how many vehicles are idling every single day.  Yes, this is a significant waste of money and resources.

So does a vehicle idling really burn that much fuel?  Studies have shown that an average car will consume one gallon of gas for each hour of idling and those costs can quickly add up.  You should turn off your engine if you’re going to be stopped for more than 30 seconds, except in traffic.  This is just another compelling reason to reduce traffic.

We should also reduce idling is to prolong the life of your car.  Idling can cause damage to your vehicle’s engine since it is not working at its peak temperature.  This can result in incomplete fuel combustion which leads to several engine problems and potential damage to your exhaust due to water condensation.

Finally, idling is a health issue.  Vehicle emissions are known to cause significant respiratory health effects.  Children can suffer with asthma and the elderly struggle with emphysema and chronic bronchitis.  Any reduction in exhaust fumes would improve respiratory health since the air would be cleaner.

We can not idly sit back and wait for someone else to fix our problems.  Each of us needs to make small contributions every day to have a big impact.  What will your contribution be?

photo credit: TheTruthAbout…

Hypermiling is an interesting method of increasing your car’s gas mileage by making changes in the way you drive.

Accelerating more slowly away from green lights and stopping more gradually for red lights can cut fuel consumption by 25 percent or more.  This change along with maintaining more steady driving speeds would have a dramatic effect on reducing our current energy consumption.

With today’s high traffic congestion, vehicles are getting lower mileage due to more frequent braking, an ever increasing amount of idling time and longer commuting time.  If Passenger Energy could reduce the number of vehicles on the road, we would not only save big on all the vehicles left home, but also by running the remaining ones much more efficiently.

photo credit: edkohler

Car & Passenger Vehicle Facts - lots of cars cost lots of money

The average American spends an hour and half in the car every day.  There are 300 million people in the U.S. and over 230 million registered vehicles.

Burning a gallon of gasoline produces 20 pounds of carbon dioxide, which contains 5 pounds of pure carbon.  So an average car that travels just 1,000 miles a month at an above average 25 miles per gallon would burn 40 gallons of gasoline and produce 800 pounds of carbon dioxide.  Just think about those numbers per car per month and multiply by 230 million.

In 2004, U.S. cars and light trucks traveled a combined 2.7 trillion miles. According to AAA, owning and operating a vehicle costs an average of $9,531 each year.  These costs include the type of vehicle, insurance, maintenance, tolls, parking fees and gasoline.

Wouldn’t you like to reduce those costs and drastically cut our emissions?

photo credit: srish